Pound heads for worst week in over a year; oil set for biggest weekly gain since early 2023 – business live

Rachel Reeves also paved the way for a rise in capital spending at the budget later this month, dropping the broadest possible hint that she could change the government’s fiscal rules to enable this.

“We’ll set out details of the fiscal rules at the budget, but we have got to make sure we unlock that space for capital investment,” she told journalists ahead of a visit to the Liverpool city region today to announce almost £22bn of funding over 25 years for carbon capture and storage projects.

The Guardian will be at the trip with the chancellor, prime minister Keir Starmer, and energy secretary Ed Miliband, later this morning.

Reeves suggested she could outline upgraded investment plans at her 30 October tax and spending event. At the Conservatives’ last budget in March forecasts showed public investment was set to fall from 2.4% of national output to about 1.7% by 2028-29. Labour’s manifesto plans would limit that drop to about 1.8%.

However, Reeves hinted she could go further, saying of Tory plans to cut investment spending that she was “not going to make those mistakes”.

She said:

“They were cutting back on investment, at exactly the time we need to be increasing investment in our economy.

“I haven’t hidden my ambitions to want to boost capital spending in the UK. I absolutely want to do that, it’s how to break out of this sort of doom loop of low growth and deteriorating living standards. That means prioritising capital investment, particularly capital investment that leverages in the private sector.”

The Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that keeping investment at current levels as a share of GDP would cost £24bn a year of additional spending by 2028-29. To avoid real-terms cuts over the same period would mean a top up of about £18bn by that year.

Merseyside is currently the place to be for big Labour announcements. The chancellor’s comments come after she used her conference speech in Liverpool last week to suggest she could relax her fiscal rules to engineer an investment boom.

There are more details on her options for doing so here:

Reeves warns of risk of inflation shock from Middle East crisis

Richard Partington

Rachel Reeves has said Britain’s economy faces heightened risks of an inflation shock from a spiralling conflict in the Middle East.

Speaking to journalists ahead of a trip to the Liverpool city region today to announce a multibillion pound investment in carbon capture and storage, the chancellor said the Treasury was closely monitoring developments amid escalating tensions between Israel and Iran.

Reeves referred to the Guardian’s exclusive interview with the Bank of England governor, Andrew Bailey, on Thursday, where he warned of “very serious” risks to the economy from the worsening conflict with potential to reignite inflationary pressures.

“I very much accept what the Bank of England governor said yesterday,” the chancellor said, adding:

“This is a very real risk to the UK and global economy

“There’s a risk both on inflation and on GDP. It’s something we’ll keep a close eye on, these things. So far the response has been quite minimal but obviously these are important things to keep an eye on.”

Reeves said that although oil prices had risen sharply in recent days (see earlier post) they remained significantly lower than the levels seen a year ago, while highlighting that equity markets had remained relatively calm despite the mounting fears over the Middle East conflict.

“I recognise that there are big risks, there, if this does become a full blown regional conflict,” she said. The chancellor warned the main dangers for inflation were currently coming from disruption in the Red Sea to global shipping, which was driving up the cost of freight shipments, where Houthi rebels, backed by Iran, have been attacking international freight.

She said:

“The biggest impact so far in terms of economics of what’s happening in the Middle East is on shipping costs.”.

Oil prices spiked on Thursday after President Joe Biden suggested his administration has been “discussing” possible Israeli plans to attack Iran’s oil industry in retaliation for the Iranian ballistic missile attack on Tuesday. The price of a barrel of oil shot up by about 5% to about $77. However, that remains below a peak this year of over $90 a barrel back in April.

Economists warn a spiralling conflict pushing up oil prices and freight costs could unpick progress to bring down inflation over the past year, which has enabled the world’s most powerful central banks to begin cutting interest rates. Bailey told the Guardian on Thursday that if the news on inflation remained good, the Bank could be in a position to be “a bit more aggressive” on cutting borrowing costs.

The oil price is on track for its biggest monthly gains in over a year, as tensions in the Middle East have risen alarmingly.

Brent crude, the international benchmark, has climbed by 7.8% so far this week, to $77.60 per barrel, a gain of $5.60.

That would be its biggest percentage gain since February 2023, and largest dollar rise since October 2023.

Fears of potential supply disruption have lifted oil.

It jumped on Tuesday, when Iran launched its missile attack on Israel, and again yesterday when US president Joe Biden said the US was discussing with Israel the possibility of Israeli strikes on Iran’s oil infrastructure.

Brent crude is currently at a one-month high.

But, it’s still effectively flat for the year, and much lower than after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 when oil jumped over $100/barrel.

Derren Nathan, head of equity research at Hargreaves Lansdown, says the potential for disruption to Iranian production has been the key driver of the oil price this week.

Nathan explains:

Despite US sanctions, Iranian exports have increased to 1.7mn barrels per day this year.

But to put that in context, OPEC+ nations have treble that amount in spare capacity, so unless other producing nations suffer disruption, they should be able to take up that slack. However, a more worrying scenario would be the closure of the Straight of Hormuz, a vital shipping channel between Iran and Oman which has recently carried as much as 15mn barrels per day of crude, leaving potential for a significant oil price shock if marine traffic is blocked.”

Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets, and the world economy.

After a bruising few days, the pound is on track for its worst week in over a year.

Sterling has lost around 1.7% against the US dollar so far this week, as it dropped by 2.2 cents since Monday to around $1.314 this morning. That puts the pound on track for its biggest weekly loss since July 2023 – any weaker, and we’ll be back to February 2023.

It has weakened as global investors have rushed into safe-haven assets, while economists are anticipating faster cuts to UK interest rates than previously expected.

As we covered yesterday, the pound hit a three-week low against the dollar on Thursday after Bank of England governor told The Guardian that the BoE could become “a bit more activist” and “a bit more aggressive“ in its approach to lowering rates, if inflation pressures keep weakening.

That put the skids under the pound:

Before Bailey’s comments, traders had expected the BoE to be more cautious than its US and eurozone counterparts.

Not any more! RBC Capital Markets, for example, now predict the Bank could cut rates by a quarter-point at its next five meetings, bringing rates down from 5% today to 3.75% by next May.

The money markets predict slightly less easing, though – they indicate rates could have fallen to 4% by next May.

The second factor hitting the pound is a surge of money into the US dollar, which is trading near a six-week high against a basket of currencies.

Investors have sought out the safety of the greenback as Middle East tensions have risen this week, with Iran launching a missile attack at Israel and the Israeli military striking parts of Beirut.

Hubert de Barochez, senior markets economist at Capital Economics, fears the pound could be heading for more weakness, telling clients:

The British pound fell sharply on Thursday, and we suspect that it will weaken more over the next year or so given our dovish view of Bank of England policy, the currency’s still-high valuation, and stretched speculative positioning.

Also coming up today

We’ll hear from Huw Pill, one of the more hawkish policymakers at the Bank of England, this morning.

Investors are bracing for the latest US jobs report today, the last-but-one non-farm payroll before the US presidential election. It’s expected to show around 140,000 jobs were created in America last month, very slightly lower than in August.

And in the UK, the government has pledged nearly £22bn to fund carbon capture and storage projects as it tries to hit climate targets.

The chancellor, prime minister and the energy secretary, Ed Miliband, will unveil the details on a visit to the Liverpool city region on Friday declaring a “new era” for clean energy jobs.

The plan means Rachel Reeves is paving the way for a multibillion-pound increase in public-sector investment at the budget…

The agenda

• 8.30am BST: Eurozone construction PMI for September

• 8.55am BST: Bank of England’s chief economist Huw Pill to speak at the Institute Chartered Accountants in England and Wales annual conference

• 9am BST: UK new car registrations for September

• 9am BST: UN food price index for September

• 9.30am BST: UK construction PMI for September

• 1.30pm BST: US non-farm payroll jobs report for September