Apple gets a breather in Brazil

Court gives it more time to get its act together

Fruity cargo cult Apple has been given more time to sort out its anti-trust antics in Brazil.

Jobs’ Mob has faced a significant setback in Brazil, where its antitrust regulator, CADE (Administrative Council for Economic Defense), ruled against its stringent App Store policies.

The regulator demanded that Apple permit sideloading and alternative payment systems within 20 days—a timeline the tech giant described as “disproportionate,” citing concerns over user privacy and security. However, a federal court has overturned CADE’s ruling, offering Apple a reprieve.

The dispute began when e-commerce giant Mercado Libre accused Apple of stifling competition through its App Store rules. These rules, which enforce a commission structure while blocking third-party payment options and app stores, have drawn scrutiny worldwide. Critics argue that Apple’s policies limit innovation and competition, allowing the company to maintain a dominant position in the app distribution market.

Apple’s battle in Brazil mirrors ongoing global challenges. In the United States, the company is embroiled in a legal tussle with Epic Games over similar App Store practices, including its commission structure and anti-steering rules.

While Epic has secured some victories, Jobs’ Mob continues to appeal unfavourable rulings. Meanwhile, Europe’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) imposes stricter regulations on Apple, mandating increased interoperability and fairness across its platforms.

This wave of regulatory actions signals a global effort to address Big Tech’s power and influence, with governments seeking to rein in practices perceived as anti-competitive.

The overturned ruling in Brazil offers a temporary respite, but the underlying issues remain unresolved. The company’s tight control over the App Store has been a point of contention for years, and global regulators are increasingly challenging its practices.

Whether in Brazil, the US, or Europe, Apple’s resistance to change and strategic delays in complying with new rules reflect a broader battle to maintain its walled garden of delights and, above all, profitability.