Connect with us

Bussiness

Colorado prosecutors shut down, sue vehicle warranty business

Published

on

Colorado prosecutors shut down, sue vehicle warranty business

The state of Colorado wants to talk to two men about their company’s extended warranty program. 

Not randomly via phone, but face-to-face in a courtroom. Before a judge. 

The men, Jack Yedid and Ralph Anteby, both of New York, own and operate Champion Car Warranty. They’ve worked out of an office in Colorado Springs for the past three years.

The Colorado State Attorney General’s Office filed a civil lawsuit against the men and their business on Oct. 31. It accuses them of failing to fulfill the car warranties they’ve sold, advertising falsehoods, and misrepresenting their products and reputation. An El Paso County judge also gave the nod to the state’s request to put a stop to the business’s operations and freeze its assets.

Champion Car Warranty sells extended warranty coverage to vehicle owners. An extended warranty is insurance coverage for repairs once a vehicle manufacturer’s warranty expires. An extended warranty can also supplement (overlap) other coverage. 

In the case of Champion, state prosecutors claim its owners have unlawfully earned more than $2 million from customers across the country.

Getty Images


An older couple from Saguache is among Champion’s unhappy customers. The lawsuit’s complaint relayed the experience of the man and woman, both in their 70’s and only identified by their initials “C.G.” and “S.G.” After viewing Champion’s website, “C.G.” spoke by phone with a representative who led her to believe her husband’s truck repair would be covered, including a part of the diesel exhaust system which the couple believed to be failing. “C.G.” purchased five years of warranty coverage from Champion with a $2,300 lump sum payment.

A month later, the exhaust part failed. Champion did not honor the agreement to cover the cost of the repair.

“Champion rejected a claim for the exact services it had promised would be covered,” as stated by prosecutors.

The Saguache couple tried to cancel the warranty contract and get a refund. They received no refund, according to the complaint, nor a purported $400 “courtesy check” a representative promised them.  

That the couple received a response to their inquiry was unusual, according to the complaint. A state investigator called the company and was put on hold for an hour. Seconds after the automated system told him he was next in line to speak with a company representative, the call was disconnected. Many customers have reported the same experience when trying to contact the company, according to the state’s complaint.

Customer service aside, the state’s investigation also cited blatant examples of the company misleading the public.

For instance, Champion’s website included a statement about a donation being made to “Operation Military Family” for every new customer contract received by the company. Investigators discovered Champion has made only a single $100 donation to the charity. And that check bounced. 

“In fact, the military charity has never received a cent from Champion,” the complaint reads.

ag-sues-car-warranty-company-military-donation-claim-from-state-complaint.jpg
A graphic clipped from Champion Car Warranty’s website by Colorado state prosecutors who claim the charity “never received a cent” from the company. 

Colorado Attorney General’s Office


“S.G.” is a disabled veteran, and Champion’s claims of charity toward veterans may have swayed the Saguache couple, prosecutors noted, as well as other customers. Prosecutors went so far as to speculate the company opened its office in Colorado Springs to lure in members of the military community there. Colorado Springs is home to Schriever Space Force Base, Peterson Space Force Base, Cheyenne Mountain Space Force Station, the Air Force Academy, and the U.S. Army’s Fort Carson Garrison.  

“Defendants targeted Colorado consumers by purporting to support a military charity and told at least one Colorado consumer (who was himself a veteran) that Champion had ‘served the veteran community for decades,'” prosecutors stated in the complaint. “Again, these representations were false.”

Prosecutors cited other deceptive claims from the company’s website:

  • Champion advertises its services are “Accepted By All Dealerships & Local Mechanics Nationwide” and offers round-the-clock roadside assistance and a 30-day money back guarantee.   
  • Three different plans – Gold, Silver, and Bronze Standards – all offer “Roadside Assistance” as part of their services. Here, it prominently displays that it has a rating of “4.3 out of 5 stars” on “3,032” reviews. There is no attribution to this data.
  • Champion asserts it is recognized in the industry as “Car Talk’s Best Extended Warranty,” that it is a member of the Vehicle Protection Association, and that it is has a high approval rating from thousands of customers, including five out of five stars on Google Reviews.  
ag-sues-car-warranty-company-combo-for-web.jpg
Graphics clipped from the Champions Car Warranty website asserting the business’s professional accolades and favorable reviews, none of which are true, according to Colorado state prosecutors. Last month, those prosecutors filed a civil lawsuit against the two New York residents who own and operate Champions, claiming the owners have violated the Colorado Consumer Protection Act.

Colorado Attorney General’s Office


All of the claims, according to state prosecutors, are false. The claimed positive reviews were particularly confounding to state prosecutors in light of Champion’s current rating on commercial review sites Yelp and Trustpilot. Those ratings are1.7 (out of 5) and 2.3, per the complaint.       

Prosecutors also point out that Yedid and Anteby have created similar businesses in other states. They named three: 

  • Patriot Warranty, which has an ‘F’ grade from the Better Business Bureau office in Sioux Falls, South Dakota
  • Napa Warranty, which has an ‘F’ grade from the BBB office in Chicago
  • and National Car Protect, which has an ‘F’ grade from Las Vegas’s BBB office

Customer complaints about all three have been received by state and federal regulatory agencies, according to the complaint.

Lastly, prosecutors claim Yedid and Anteby never obtained a “motor vehicle service contract,” a consumer protection instrument issued by the state, for Champion. That contract is required by Colorado law for any company offering extended warranties. Nor does the company’s direct contracts with customers contain language required by state law, according to the complaint.

“Champion intentionally holds itself out as a legitimate provider of extended car warranties, making promises of coverage, accessibility, reliability and trustworthiness that entice consumers into paying thousands of dollars for warranty coverage,” as stated in the complaint. “But Champion’s actual services are nothing like advertised, and its advertised affiliations and acclamations are false.

“Put simply, Champion takes the money and runs.”

The state is seeking a monetary judgement against Yedid and Anteby violations of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act. 

A call placed by CBS Colorado to the Yedid and Anteby’s Colorado Springs-based defense attorney disconnected after one ring. 

The next court hearing in the case is scheduled for Dec. 12. 

Continue Reading