How the World Is Prepping for a Trump or Harris Victory

For the rest of the world, the shorthand of the US presidential race has been that Kamala Harris represents continuity and Donald Trump chaos.

A deeper realization is also taking hold in key capitals: America’s brief heyday as the world’s lone superpower is history, no matter who wins.

Bloomberg News canvassed the mood across time zones and the prevailing sentiment from the Group of Seven establishment to the aspiring powers of the Global South is one of caution and pragmatism. The world is fixated on the result of Tuesday’s vote — even if Washington doesn’t call all the shots any more, it still calls plenty.

America’s vibrant economy remains the world’s biggest and its politicians — especially Trump — have shown they’re ready to weaponize it. So there’s widespread fear of getting caught in the crosshairs if the next president decides to ramp up a trade war with China. Many partners have tariff-escalation plans in the drawer, ready to be pulled out.

Read more: South Korea Weighs Buying More US Energy If Trump Wins Election

But there’s also a growing sense of the US as an aging superpower, one that must pick its battles more carefully in a world where the number of conflicts competing for its attention is on the rise. That’s true for Trump’s ‘America first’ and Harris’ more measured approach. One British diplomat observed that the Roman Empire didn’t suddenly end. Instead, it managed a long decline.

Ukraine is already feeling the cold shoulder, Europe is facing the existential crisis of whether it can defend itself and its neighborhood, and Israel is openly defying the appeals of its main ally and arms supplier in Washington.

A Mideast official said it was demeaning for President Joe Biden to get personally involved in pushing for a cease-fire in Gaza only for it not to happen. That impression is increasingly shared in allied capitals beyond the Middle East.

Of course, the stakes of the US election remain sky high for the world. Foreign capitals — both friends and foes — have rarely been so open in showing their preferred outcome, from public endorsements to the covert efforts to meddle that US intelligence regularly reveals.

Read more: The US Election Cost $14 Billion for 11,000 Political Groups

The global impact could be seismic. Should Trump win and seek a deal with Vladimir Putin that sells Ukraine out, the European Union will split between those who would welcome any opportunity for peace — however premature — and other nations who would want Europe to back Kyiv on its own. The “Trump electroshock” is how some on the continent describe it.

A truly isolationist and protectionist US is something the world hasn’t seen in nearly a century.

If you’re a historic foe like Russia trying to rebuild the Soviet orbit, a relic of the “axis of evil” like Iran, or a contender for global clout like India, the view that America’s best days are behind it is an opportunity to exploit.

North Korean troops are in Russia fighting in its war against Ukraine, Kyiv says. India is being accused by Canada of assassinating a Sikh separatist on its soil. China is providing support for Moscow amid its war in Ukraine and pushing harder in the South China Sea. In each case, the sense is that the US can’t or won’t do much to stop it.

Though she’s stuck close to Biden’s policies, Harris is seen as a different generation, less steeped in the Atlanticism of the Cold War. Some in Europe peg her as a Californian; more attuned to Silicon Valley and potentially more interested in the Indo-Pacific, where she also has family roots.

Diplomats note that containing China is a rare issue Democrats and Republicans agree on.

As for Trump, not all US allies see his unpredictability as purely a liability. Though he’s seen as friendlier to Russia and Israel than Harris would be, some hope he might surprise with a tougher line. Aspiring powers like India and Turkey, meanwhile, are quite comfortable with his more transactional approach.

Trump enjoyed playing golf with Shinzo Abe and despised Angela Merkel but his demands on Japan and Germany boiled down to the same thing: Pay more for US protection and buy more from the US.

Both have since hiked defense spending, having learned the lesson of greater self-reliance. A reduced US global role may raise the price further.

“This is not the apocalyptical contest over the future of American democracy that some — mainly Americans and Europeans — make it out to be,” veteran Singaporean diplomat Bilahari Kausikan wrote. “Biden was more consultative and predictable, but let’s not forget that Biden was not consulting you to inquire how your family is doing, but to see what you are prepared to do to advance America’s strategic goals.”

Here’s what the election outcome will mean for five key global issues:

More than two and a half years into Russia’s full-scale invasion, Ukraine depends on support from its allies for everything from advanced weapons to money to pay salaries. Kyiv is hoping for even more backing to convince Putin to negotiate, but the Russian president, who looks to have the upper hand, is showing no appetite for compromise, betting that allied support will gradually fade.

Harris has vowed to keep up support for as long as it takes but she’d likely face growing skepticism in Congress for major additional funding. Like Biden, Harris has so far refused to commit to grant Ukraine’s request to be allowed to use allied missiles for strikes deep inside Russia or for an invitation to join the NATO alliance, which President Volodymyr Zelenskiy says is needed to ensure his country’s security.

Trump has said he would end the war “in 24 hours” after the election by getting Putin and Zelenskiy to negotiate. He hasn’t spelled out how he’d do that but he and his running mate have repeatedly signaled Ukraine needs to be ready to make concessions. They’ve questioned why the US is spending so much to support Ukraine and argued that allies in Europe need to take up more of the burden.

Since Hamas killed 1,200 Israelis on Oct. 7, 2023, fighting in the region has steadily spread despite US efforts to contain the violence while it continues to arm Israel. Having largely crushed Hamas with strikes in Gaza, killing more than 43,000 civilians and combatants, Israeli forces are now in Lebanon, taking on Hezbollah. Israel has also exchanged strikes with Iran, which backs the two groups — considered terrorists by the US and other nations — as well as the Houthis in Yemen, who have all but closed the Red Sea to Western ships with their attacks. Looming over all the violence is Iran’s nuclear program, which is only weeks away from developing enough highly enriched uranium for a weapon, something the US and Israel vow to prevent.

Harris pledges to ensure Israel has the means it needs to defend itself but has called for more efforts to reduce the suffering of civilians in Gaza. She’s backed the Biden administration’s repeated — and so far failed — calls for cease-fires. She endorses a two-state solution, something Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has all but ruled out, though she hasn’t spelled out how such an outcome might be obtained. She dodged the question of whether Netanyahu can be considered a close US ally but called Iran America’s greatest adversary during the campaign.

Trump says the Oct. 7 attack would never have happened had he been president, without saying how he would have prevented it. He’s said Israel needed to “do a better job of public relations” and called on the country to “get it over with.” In the debate in September, he dodged the question of whether he would support a Palestinian state. He has called for more steps to isolate Iran. In his first term, he also helped broker the Abraham Accords normalizing relations between Israel and some Arab states.

The prospect of rising protectionism has central bankers and economists worried that US moves to close its market could fuel broader trade wars that will slow global growth and raise inflation.

Harris supported a Biden administration decision to extend Trump-era tariffs on China and has backed tens of billions in subsidies for clean-energy, infrastructure and high-technology investment in the US. She has embraced some trade deals but as a senator opposed others and has sought to build in protections for workers and the environment.

Trump calls for sweeping tariffs of up to 20% on imports, as well as levies as high as 60% on trade with China as a means to stimulate investment in the US, though he’s said some of the figures may be negotiating tactics. Trump argues the current international trading system is rigged against the interests of the US and promises a rebalancing if he wins the presidency again.

Read more: Forecasting America’s Economic Future Under Harris vs. Trump