Neither Russia nor China wants the Ukraine war to end, but for different reasons

“The two states are allies not because they share any particular cultural or ideological affinity; rather, they have come together on account of the old adage that the ‘enemy of my enemy is my friend,'” Chels Michta, a non-resident fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis, wrote on Wednesday.

“Their partnership is largely practical — anchored in hard power principles bereft of ideological pretense or posturing,” Michta added.

“In this realpolitik alignment, both parties believe they have more to gain from continuing to work together than they risk losing,” she continued.

Putin needs to balance out China’s hold over Russia’s economy

Russia’s economy has remained resilient in the face of more than two years of Western sanctions, partly thanks to boosts from state subsidies and wartime production.

One economist went so far as to say that Russia’s economy was so driven by the war that it couldn’t afford to win or lose in the conflict.

But Russia has also become increasingly reliant on China since it started the war in Ukraine. Bilateral trade reached a record level of $240 billion last year — a 26% jump from $190 billion a year earlier.

“It is fair to say that without China’s economic support, Russia would not have been able to brave the economic sanctions imposed on it by the West in the wake of Putin’s all-out invasion of Ukraine,” Michta wrote.

But she also noted that the boom in trade had served China’s interests more than Russia’s, putting Moscow in an increasingly subordinate position. For instance, she wrote, Russia was now “exporting raw materials to China while China sends finished goods, especially cars, to Russia — the latter at the expense of Russia’s indigenous auto industry.”

So, a key item on Putin’s agenda in China would be to get the country to endorse a proposed natural-gas pipeline from Siberia to China since Russia has lost its market in Europe — previously its single largest market — because of sanctions.

“By selling large volumes of cheap gas to China, Russia can potentially tie Beijing into a closer geopolitical alliance,” analysts at the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University wrote on Wednesday.

“Convincing China to commit to such a large project during the war would be a geopolitical coup for Moscow, demonstrating to the West and the Global South that it is able to deepen its energy relationship with China despite the war,” the energy analysts added.

But China doesn’t actually need more gas before the mid-2030s, so time is on Beijing’s side.

China says it wants peace, but it has more to gain from continued war

Beijing has called for peace in Ukraine and put forth a proposal — which some analysts say is vague — to that end last year.

But some analysts say China has more to gain from a continuing war.

“America’s continued support for Kyiv — and hence Russia’s inability to secure its gains in short order — is actually in Beijing’s interest,” CEPA’s Michta wrote.

“The termination of US aid would work against China since the implosion of Ukraine would halt — or at least slow — Moscow’s slide toward vassal-like dependency on Beijing,” she added.

Michta, who’s also a military intelligence officer serving in the US Army, said Beijing appeared to have decided that backing Russia was worth any retaliation from the West.

As she noted, an increasingly dependent Russia may be able to offer Beijing key military technology it has developed in the post-Soviet era, thus helping China make huge strides in the sector.

Moscow and Beijing want to upend the West’s dominance in the global order

Despite their attempts to one-up each other, Russia and China’s ever-closer relationship is a problem for the West.

“Currently, a unity of purpose between the autocratic powers has created the closest relationship in decades. China and Russia are forging a partnership increasingly reminiscent of a great power alliance,” Michta wrote.

In particular, Beijing has set its sights further than Russia — which is more interested in changing power relationships in Europe.

“Beijing is pursuing a far more ambitious project aimed at changing the foundations of the global order,” Michta wrote, “ending once and for all the era of worldwide Western dominion.”