Fashion
‘Too controversial’: Meghan Markle forced to wear clothing from smaller fashion houses
Meghan Markle is being forced to wear clothing from smaller fashion houses, according to style experts.
The Duchess of Sussex, 42, wore a pair of £360 trousers from Australian brand St Agni to a business summit in the Hamptons, New York, over the weekend.
Fans noticed the duchess’s feet were totally obscured by her trousers.
Celebrity stylist Rochelle White claimed Meghan’s trousers were potentially a sample pair from St Agni and therefore not possible to alter to her five foot six inches frame, either because they have to be returned or because they’ve been given to the stylist rather than directly to the Duchess of Sussex.
She said: “I know that wide leg long trousers are in fashion and a trendy piece right now.
“They have been dominating Instagram and runways, so I think she likes the style.
“They are great at cinching the waist but also adding depth to an outfit. They can be flattering and comfortable so not so restrictive.
“The duchess could also be working with either a designer, fashion house, or stylist where it might not be possible to have alterations done so that they are more fitting to her leg length. So, as a result, they are longer.”
Meghan Markle wearing an oversized linen outfit at a summit in New York
Fashion expert Giorgina Ramazzotti also claimed that while Meghan has worn Dior and Givenchy in the past, she could now be seen as too “controversial” a figure to get free samples from some major fashion houses.
Ramazzotti continued to tell The Daily Mail: “As a celebrity and actress before joining the royals, Meghan would have been very used to a world in which everything is given on loan for photoshoots, an appearance or borrowed from wardrobe as part of her character in Suits.
“Celebrities rarely have to part with cold hard cash in exchange for fashion items.
“Often items are given as gifts, given on loan for special events, or the star is given a heavy discount to shop the brand, and whilst Meghan wasn’t a well-known actress before meeting Prince Harry, she would still have been given freebies – albeit from smaller brands.
Meghan Markle seen at the Invictus Games in 2023
Getty
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle receiving a warm welcome party when they touched down in Nigeria
Reuters
“When she joined the royals, she quickly found out that loans and gifts from designers were forbidden, and the star was no doubt given an allowance to dress – something I’m sure she was glad to throw out of the window when she left the royal fold.
“It can be noted that Meghan rarely wears big designer brands such as the French fashion houses Louis Vuitton, Chanel, Saint Laurent etc.
“These brands are very careful with their image and getting loans from them for lesser or controversial stars (as Meghan, in some circles, now is) is like getting blood from a stone.”
In June 2023, French fashion house Dior was forced to deny it had signed a huge deal with the duchess, who was rumoured to become the face of the brand. It had been speculated any deal could be worth as much as £15million to Prince Harry and Meghan.
EA Sports College Football 25 predicts Georgia-Ole Miss game
CryptoCasinos.online is now live – Redefining the online gambling experience
Vol Walk time announced ahead of Tennessee-Mississippi State game
PlayStation 5 Pro: what does the PS4 image enhancement feature actually do?
TravelAbility and KultureCity Team Up to Make Travel More Accessible for Individuals with Sensory Needs! – Travel And Tour World
Giants’ Brian Daboll picks MetLife Stadium over any field in the world ahead of Panthers matchup in Germany
Five Vols listed as out against Mississippi State
ENTERTAINMENT: Classical guitarist Vieaux joins violinist for concert | Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
